Then Alim conveyed his views regarding the high potential for corruption at the village level. According to him, there are many underlying problems that arise, one of which is weak review and monitoring. \"Most corruption occurs when using the budget. This potential is prone to arise if the community does not come during the discussion and planning of the village APBD, plus there is no review and monitoring,\" explained Alim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Alim emphasized that the potential for corruption in the village could arise from five things, namely during Planning, Procurement, Implementation, Accountability, Supervision and, monitoring. Therefore, to minimize the potential for corruption, said Alim, the community must get used to practicing the three Ls. \"Remember the three Ls to eradicate corruption, See, Fight, and Report,\" said Alim while asking the class participants to imitate his words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Social Audit Practices of Poverty Alleviation Programs<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Meanwhile, in a different class with different materials and speakers, an important topic regarding the \u2018Social Audit Practices of Poverty Alleviation Programs\u2019 was also discussed. This discussion was started by a presentation by Rosmiyatun from JMKP. She said that the social audit practices she studied were related to assistance for poor students. According to Ros, this was due to findings in the field regarding the inequality of aid recipients.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In more detail, Ros revealed that his findings regarding the inequality of recipients of assistance for poor students emerged due to several problems, including, as expressed by Ros, the lack of socialization by the school, the lack of transparency by the school, participation only by the regional and central governments, inappropriate targeting, and the lack of involvement of civil society in the control process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Regarding the efforts that can be made in relation to social audits to overcome poverty, Ros recommended several important steps that can be taken by activists and the government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"We need to encourage the use of an integrated database, involve the participation of poor people, encourage poverty policy programs from villages to higher levels so that they do not overlap, provide information, encourage the government to increase capacity for the community, encourage monitoring meetings involving residents, held at least once a semester, encourage the lowest level government, namely the RT, and provide services that are easily accessible to the poor and can be followed up by the local government,\" concluded Ros.<\/p>\n\n\n\n BDT Update with AKP Method<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n An interesting discussion that was not missed was the technical issue of updating the Integrated Database (BDT) with the Participatory Poverty Analysis (AKP) method. In this discussion, there were two speakers who explained in detail the theme above. Both of them explained their understanding and experience gained while actively assisting the community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Wahyu Setianingsih, one of the speakers of this discussion, shared her experience when she first practiced this method. She said that she had been in contact with the community since 9 years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"I have been in frequent contact with the community since 2008. We were asked to talk about updating the database. Overall, poverty data is very different from reality. Many government programs are not on target. For example, direct cash assistance is mostly received by people with high economic levels. We are trying to collect data to identify the poor,\" said the woman who is familiarly called Wahyu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Wahyu regretted the lack of public attention, especially village officials, to the chaotic data management. According to Wahyu, villages are sources of data, but poor in data. He finally took the initiative to take important steps together with village observers and government officials to improve the data management system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"In 2011, IDEA together with CRI and SAPA introduced us to the Village Information System. In 2015, we received full support from Bappeda Gunung Kidul, and we started to receive BDT. We were facilitated for workshops and trainings to verify and validate this BDT. Validating BDT data turned out to be very complicated, especially during re-registration,\" said Wahyu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Furthermore, Wahyu reminded that in the data validation process, there are eight criteria in poverty data, which, said Wahyu, include permanent household status, changing households, moving households, changing heads of households, changing number of families, new poor households, and unknown households.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Meanwhile, Zakaria, another resource person in this discussion explained at the beginning that the causes of poverty are also influenced by environmental factors. People can suddenly become poor if their area is a flood pocket or endemic pocket. So, according to him, looking at the causes of poverty must be seen from four basic aspects such as, minimal environmental carrying capacity, minimal supporting capacity for increasing capabilities, powerlessness in fulfilling basic rights, and policy regulations that do not favor the poor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To carry out poverty alleviation efforts, according to Wahyu, there are four things that can be done, including efforts in territorial\/spatial-based participatory poverty studies, participatory poverty studies based on livelihoods, participatory poverty studies based on poor families and regulatory assessments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \"Musrenbang proposals are often based on desires, not needs. The characteristics of the poor, in a meeting forum, will not admit to being poor and will only wait to be proposed. This is why AKP is needed. We strive to include the voices of the poor in the discussion. AKP as an instrument to include the views of the poor,\" he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the end of his presentation, Zakaria hoped that participants would expand their space when they intend to make changes. This is important, because according to Zakaria, space for change can emerge from many policy makers. \"I hope that my friends do not only move at the village level. Because we want to open the government's eyes that our data is more precise. In order to be drawn to the Regency, the indicators must be the same. The village team is welcome to try to create precise data,\" he said. (AH)<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Lokakarya Nasional Greget Desa 2017 sudah memasuki hari kedua pada Kamis, (08\/17). Tepat di jam 15.00 WIB, acara yang dijadwalkan berupa diskusi kelas sesi II. Tema utama dalam diskusi kelas tersebut adalah Inovasi Tranparansi Akuntabilitas. Rangkaian ini merupakan kelanjutan dari diskusi kelas sebelumnya yang membahas tema yang berbeda. Dalam diskusi kelas sesi II, hadir beberapa narasumber inti, diantaranya dari Relawan Prenggan, Saya Perempuan Anti Korupsi (SPAK), JMKP Kulon Progo, YPKM Makasar, serta Tim pengelola SID desa Girisuko. Mereka menyampaikan materi di tiga kelas berbeda, dengan diikuti 35an peserta di masing-masing kelas. Diskusi kelas kali ini disampaikan sembari diselingi dengan beberapa game dan sharing, sehingga suasana kelas menjadi lebih interaktif. Alimatul Qibtiyah, yang menjadi salah satu narasumber pada pembahasan \u2018Menginisiasi Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Melalui Kampung Antikorupsi\u2019 bercerita terntang keterlibatannya dalam gerakan antikorupsi bersama para perempuan yang kemudian popular disebut SPAK. \u201cSaya Perempuan Anti Korupsi (SPAK) berdiri pada tahun 2014 dan akhirnya menjadi gerakan secara nasional. Kegiatannya banyak berupa permainan, baik untuk anak tk, sd dan dewasa\u201d Kata Alim. Kemudian Alim menyampaikan pandangannya terkait tingginya potensi korupsi di tingkat desa. Menurutnya, banyak problem yang mendasari masalah itu muncul, salah satunya, seperti lemahnya peninjauan dan monitoring. \u201cSebagaian besar korupsi terjadi saat mengunakan anggaran. Potensi itu rawan muncul jika saat pembahasan dan perencanaan soal APBD desa masyarakat tidak dating, ditambah tidak adanya peninjauan dan monitoring,\u201d jelas Alim. Alim menegaskan bahwa potensi munculnya korupsi di desa bisa muncul dari lima hal, yakni saat Perencanaan, Pengadaan, Pelaksanaan, Pertanggungjawaban, Pengawasanan dan, monitoring. Karenannya untuk meminimalisir potensi korup tersebut, kata Alim, masyarakat harus membiasakan praktek tiga L. \u201c Ingat tiga L untuk memberantas korupsi, Lihat, Lawan, dan Lapor,\u201d Kata Alim sambil meminta peseerta kelas menirukan ucapannya. Praktek Audit Sosial Program Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Sementara itu, di kelas yang berbeda dengan materi dan pembicara yang berbeda pula, topik penting mengenai \u2018Praktek Audit Sosial Program Penanggulangan Kemiskinan\u2019 juga dibahas. Pembahasan ini diawali oleh penyampaian Rosmiyatun dari JMKP. Ia menuturkan bahwa praktek audit sosial yang ia kaji ialah terkait bantuan siswa miskin. Hal itu, menurut Ros, disebabkan adanya temuan di lapangan terkait ketimpangan penerima bantuan. Lebih detail, Ros mengungkapkan bahwa temuannya terkair ketimpangan penerima bantuan siswa miskin muncul sebab beberapa persoalan, diantaranya seperti diungkakan oleh Ros ialah Kurangnya sosialisasi oleh pihak sekolah, tidak transparannya pihak sekolah, partisipasi yang hanya diikuti oleh pemerintah daerah dan pusat, tidak tepatnya sasaran, serta belum dilibatkannya warga masayarakat sipil dalam proses control. Terkait upaya yang ia bisa dilakukan kaitannya dengan audit social penanggulangan kemiskinan, Ros merekomendasikan beberapa langkah penting yang bisa dilakukan oleh para pegiat dan pemerintah. \u201dKita perlu mendorong pegunanaan basis data terpadu, melibatkan partsipasi warga miskin, mendorong progam kebijakan kemiskinan dari desa sampai tingkat yang lebih tinggi supaya tidak tumpang tindih, memberikan informasi, medorong pemerintah agar meningkatkan kapasditas bagi masyarakat, mendorong pertemuan monitoring yang melibatkan warga, dilaksakan min 1 x semester, mendorong pemerintah palin bahwah yaitu RT, serta memberikan layanan yang mudah diakases oleh masyarakat msikin dan bisa ditindak lanjuti oleh pemerintah daerah,\u201d Pungkas Ros. Pemutakhiran BDT dengan Metode AKP Diskusi menarik yang tak luput dibahas ialah soal teknis pemutakhiran Basis Data Terpadu (BDT) dengan metode Analisis Kemiskinan Partisipatif (AKP). Dalam diskusi ini ada dua pembicara yang menjelaskan secara rinci terkait tema diatas. Keduanya menjelaskan pemahaman dan pengalamannya yang diperoleh selama aktif mendampingi masyarakat. Wahyu Setianingsih, salah satu pembicara diskusi ini menceritakan pengalamannya saat pertama kali mempraktikkan metode ini. Ia bercerita bahwa dirinya sudah bersinggungan dengan masyarakat sejak 9 tahun yang lalu. \u201c Saya sering berhubungan dengan masyarakat sejak 2008. Kami diminta bercerita tentang penutakhiran basis data. Secara keseluruhan data kemiskinan banyak sekali perbedaan dengan realita. Banyak program pemerintah yang tida tepat sasaran. Contohnya bantuan langsung tunai banyak darii penduduk dengan tingkat ekonomi tinggi yang mendapatkan. Kami mencoba melakukan pendataan untuk mengenali penduduk miskin,\u201d tutur perempuan yang akrab disapa Wahyu itu. Wahyu menyayangkan terkait minimnya perhatian masyarakat, khususnya perangkat desa terhadap pengelolaan data yang amburadul. Desa menurut Wahyu adalah sumber data, tetapi miskin akan data. Dirinya akhirnya berinisitif untuk mengambil langkah penting bersama-sama dengan para pemehati desa dan perangkat pemerintah guna memperbaiki system tata kelola data. \u201cTahun 2011 IDEA bersama CRI dan SAPA kami dikenalkan dengan sistem Informasi desa.. Pada 2015 mendapatkan dukungan penuh dari Bappeda Gunung kidul, kami mulai mendapatkan BDT. Kami difasilitasi untuk workshop- workshop dan pelatihan-pelatihan untuk verifikasi dan validasi BDT ini. Untuk validasi data BDT ternyata begitu rumit, utamanya saat pendataan ulang,\u201d kata Wahyu. Lebih lanjut, Wahyu mengingatkan, bahwa dalam proses validasi data, ada delapan kriteria dalam data kemiskinan, hal tersebut, kata Wahyu, meliputi status tumah tangga tetap, rumah tangga berubah, rumah tangga pindah, ganti kepala rumah tangga, jumlah keluarga berubah, rumah tangga miskin baru, serta rumah tangga tidak dikenal Sementara itu, Zakaria, narasumber lain dalam diskusi ini menjelaskan diawal bahwa penyebab Kemiskinan dipengaruhi juga oleh faktor lingkungan. Orang bisa tiba-tiba miskin jika wilayahnya merupakan kantong banjir atau kantong endemik. Maka, menurutnya, melihat penyebab kemiskinan harus dilihat dari empat aspek mendasar seperti, minimnya daya dukung lingkungan, minimnya daya dukung peningkatan kemampuan, ketidakberdayaan dalam memenuhi hak dasar, serta regulasi kebijakan yang tidak memihak warga miskin. Untuk melakukan upaya-upaya pengentasan, menurut wahyu, ada empat hal yang bisa dilakukan, hal itu diantaranya meliputi upaya-upaya Kajian kemiskinan partisipatif berbasis teritorial\/spasial, kajian kemiskinan partisipatif berbasis mata pencaharian, kajian kemiskinan partisipatif berbasis keluarga miskin serta assesment regulasi. \u201cUsulan musrenbang seringkali didasarkan pada keinginan bukan kebutuhan. Karakteristik warga miskin, di dalam forum pertemuan tidak akan mengaku miskin dan hanya menunggu diusulkan. Inilah mengapa dibutuhkan AKP. Kami mengupayakan suara si miskin masuk di dalam pembahasan. AKP sebagai instrumen memasukkan pandangan si miskin,\u201d tegasnya. Di akhir pemaparannya, Zakaria berharap agar peserta memperluas ruang gerak saat berniat melakukan perubahan. Ini penting, sebab menurut Zakaria, ruang perubahan bisa saja muncul dari di banyak pemangku kebijakan. \u201cSaya berharap, kawan-kawan jangan hanya bergerak pada level desa. Karena kita ingin membuka mata pemerintah bahwa data kita lebih presisi. Agar bisa ditarik ke Kabupaten, maka indikatornya harus sama. Tim desa silahkan untuk berusaha membuat data yang presisi,\u201d katanya. (AH)<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1510,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_theme","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[113],"tags":[93,76,120,119],"class_list":["post-1507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-penanggulangan-kemiskinan","tag-advokasi","tag-akuntabilitas","tag-audit-sosial","tag-dana-desa"],"amp_enabled":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1507"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1507\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1511,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1507\/revisions\/1511"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/DSC_0098-1-768x512-1.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/DSC_0064-768x512-1.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n