{"id":1819,"date":"2012-01-19T16:09:00","date_gmt":"2012-01-19T16:09:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/?p=1819"},"modified":"2024-10-13T16:26:50","modified_gmt":"2024-10-13T16:26:50","slug":"e-book-di-mana-uang-kami-advokasi-anggaran-di-indonesia-kumpulan-kisah-advokasi-anggaran-versi-indonesia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/2012\/01\/19\/e-book-di-mana-uang-kami-advokasi-anggaran-di-indonesia-kumpulan-kisah-advokasi-anggaran-versi-indonesia\/","title":{"rendered":"E-book: Where's Our Money? Budget Advocacy in Indonesia Budget Advocacy Stories Collection (Indonesian version)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Foreword<\/strong>The journey of budget advocacy in Indonesia began with the rise of the anti-corruption movement, precisely since the start of the regional autonomy era in 2000. Corruption, which was initially centralized, also shifted to the provinces and districts\/cities. Regional executive and parliamentary institutions became hotbeds of corruption. The fight against corruption was the initial agenda of budget advocacy activists, along with the implementation of fiscal decentralization. Furthermore, budget advocacy shifted to measuring budget allocations in fulfilling basic rights while encouraging a participatory, transparent, and accountable budgeting process. The book you are reading attempts to document the experiences of budget advocacy activists when dealing with various cases of corruption and poor regional budget management. The scope of experiences recorded in this manuscript is quite broad. The Seknas Fitra, Tiada Kata Cukup? (Seknas Fitra, Is There Never Enough?) report for example, shows that budget advocacy cannot be separated from aspects of regulations and legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In another section, PATTIRO Malang shares their experience in encouraging the formation and implementation of regional budgets that are oriented towards fulfilling the basic rights of citizens, especially education. Their advocacy experience can be seen in the article Achieving the Right to Education Through BOSDA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fulfillment of the right to health is also the target of the budget advocacy movement. The urgency of this issue has absorbed many resources from civil society organizations, one of which is the Perkumpulan Inisiatif, Bandung. Their efforts to formulate a budget policy basis that guarantees access to affordable health services are stated in Sehat Itu Murah dan Mudah. \u200b\u200bThe Regional Regulation on health insurance is expected to be a starting point so that health services for the poor are affordable and easily accessible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of the many health problems in Indonesia, women's and children's reproductive health is quite prominent. High maternal mortality rates, various cases of malnourished children (babies born with low birth weight) are the background to the health budget advocacy movement carried out by women's groups. The involvement of women in integrated service posts or better known as Posyandu has inspired PATTIRO Surakarta to answer the advocacy challenges in that sector. Their report is in the article Marrying the Role of Citizens and APBD Contributions in Posyandu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Encouraging the role of marginalized groups in advocating for budgets in fulfilling their basic rights is also carried out by groups with disabilities (different abilities). SAPDA's efforts in Encouraging the Rise of the Disabled to Fight for Rights began to be realized from the advocacy process carried out in Yogyakarta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar things were done by farmer groups organized by KSPPM in North Tapanuli Regency. In Indonesia, which is an agricultural country with a population that is mostly farmers, it is only right that farmers are more prosperous and receive adequate budget allocations to increase agricultural output. The article entitled Understanding the Budget Harvesting Welfare tells the story of farmers' efforts in advocating for agricultural budgets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fulfillment of socio-cultural economic rights as basic citizen rights through the budget is complemented by advocacy of the budget process for the fulfillment of civil and political rights. In the budget cycle that begins with planning, the bargaining position of civil society and marginalized groups will greatly influence the direction of budget policy. With the keywords participation, transparency, and accountability, improvements to the budget process are carried out by civil society elements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Efforts to encourage the Institutionalization of Regional Budget Participation and Transparency were carried out by P3ML in Sumedang Regency. Through the Regional Planning and Budgeting Procedures Regulation, the idea of \u200b\u200bregional indicative ceilings and the Musrenbang Delegation Forum was stipulated in the Regulation. This Regulation became a reference for advocacy in many regions in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition to institutionalizing the budgeting process in a regulation, strengthening the budgeting process is also carried out by consolidating all elements of civil society in the region. Civil society networks become a force to influence regional budgets. Relevant experiences regarding this were written by FITRA Riau in the article Budget Reallocation Towards Effectiveness and Efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Encouraging pressure groups to fight for budget allocations that favor the people is very effective and moving. One of them is the experience of Lakpesdam NU which was recorded in When the People and Ulama Advocate for the Budget. Through Batsul Masail as a decision-making method for the ulama, budget problems were discussed and resolved. This experience in Cilacap Regency can be an effective model for other regions to strengthen advocacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition to encouraging religious groups to be involved in the budgeting process, several institutions that care about gender-responsive budgeting encourage women to participate in the budgeting process. They not only pursue a minimum quota of 30% for women in political participation but also create their own procedures to unite women in one voice through women's Musrenbang. IDEA's experience in the Meaninglessness of Participation Without Allocation is expected to be a model of participation with clear allocation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These various notes on the budget advocacy process are presented in the book entitled Where is Our Money? Budget Advocacy in Indonesia. The book, which is printed in two languages, is expected to provide a direct picture of the notes of budget advocates. We hope that the stories of success, failure, and changes contained in this manuscript can inspire readers in understanding budget advocacy in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The process of summarizing this story is one of the follow-ups to the meeting of five budget advocacy institutions (IDEA - Initiative - Lakpesdam NU - PATTIRO - Seknas FITRA). These five institutions are in the process with the support of the Partnership Initiative of the International Budget Partnership to provide an overview of the most significant changes in budget advocacy carried out in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It must be admitted that budget advocates who are enthusiastic in the process of advocacy are often in tatters in writing their experiences. However, the hard work of the authors to present and summarize their notes and memories deserves appreciation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our gratitude goes to the core team of the collaboration of 5 institutions, the authors, editors, and translators who have been in the process of presenting this book. Our special gratitude<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Foreword<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Budget Advocacy in Indonesia | vii<\/p>\n\n\n\n

convey to Debbie Budlender - part of the Partnership Initiative support - who was very patient in providing advice and guiding with sharp questions during the preparation of this book. In addition, the International Budget Partnership team that has supported the writing process deserves our deepest gratitude.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We hope that this book can be a valuable contribution to budget advocacy in Indonesia and be an inspiration for other countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yogyakarta, May 20, 2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n

IDEA \u2013 Initiative \u2013 Lakpesdam \u2013 Pattiro \u2013 FITRA National Secretariat<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Foreword<\/strong>The journey of budget advocacy in Indonesia began with the rise of the anti-corruption movement, precisely since the start of the regional autonomy era in 2000. Corruption, which was initially centralized, also shifted to the provinces and districts\/cities. Regional executive and parliamentary institutions became hotbeds of corruption. The fight against corruption was the initial agenda of budget advocacy activists, along with the implementation of fiscal decentralization. Furthermore, budget advocacy shifted to measuring budget allocations in fulfilling basic rights while encouraging a participatory, transparent, and accountable budgeting process. The book you are reading attempts to document the experiences of budget advocacy activists when dealing with various cases of corruption and poor regional budget management. The scope of experiences recorded in this manuscript is quite broad. The Seknas Fitra, Tiada Kata Cukup? (Seknas Fitra, Is There Never Enough?) report for example, shows that budget advocacy cannot be separated from aspects of regulations and legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In another section, PATTIRO Malang shares their experience in encouraging the formation and implementation of regional budgets that are oriented towards fulfilling the basic rights of citizens, especially education. Their advocacy experience can be seen in the article Achieving the Right to Education Through BOSDA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fulfillment of the right to health is also the target of the budget advocacy movement. The urgency of this issue has absorbed many resources from civil society organizations, one of which is the Perkumpulan Inisiatif, Bandung. Their efforts to formulate a budget policy basis that guarantees access to affordable health services are stated in Sehat Itu Murah dan Mudah. \u200b\u200bThe Regional Regulation on health insurance is expected to be a starting point so that health services for the poor are affordable and easily accessible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Of the many health problems in Indonesia, women's and children's reproductive health is quite prominent. High maternal mortality rates, various cases of malnourished children (babies born with low birth weight) are the background to the health budget advocacy movement carried out by women's groups. The involvement of women in integrated service posts or better known as Posyandu has inspired PATTIRO Surakarta to answer the advocacy challenges in that sector. Their report is in the article Marrying the Role of Citizens and APBD Contributions in Posyandu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Encouraging the role of marginalized groups in advocating for budgets in fulfilling their basic rights is also carried out by groups with disabilities (different abilities). SAPDA's efforts in Encouraging the Rise of the Disabled to Fight for Rights began to be realized from the advocacy process carried out in Yogyakarta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar things were done by farmer groups organized by KSPPM in North Tapanuli Regency. In Indonesia, which is an agricultural country with a population that is mostly farmers, it is only right that farmers are more prosperous and receive adequate budget allocations to increase agricultural output. The article entitled Understanding the Budget Harvesting Welfare tells the story of farmers' efforts in advocating for agricultural budgets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fulfillment of socio-cultural economic rights as basic citizen rights through the budget is complemented by advocacy of the budget process for the fulfillment of civil and political rights. In the budget cycle that begins with planning, the bargaining position of civil society and marginalized groups will greatly influence the direction of budget policy. With the keywords participation, transparency, and accountability, improvements to the budget process are carried out by civil society elements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Efforts to encourage the Institutionalization of Regional Budget Participation and Transparency were carried out by P3ML in Sumedang Regency. Through the Regional Planning and Budgeting Procedures Regulation, the idea of \u200b\u200bregional indicative ceilings and the Musrenbang Delegation Forum was stipulated in the Regulation. This Regulation became a reference for advocacy in many regions in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition to institutionalizing the budgeting process in a regulation, strengthening the budgeting process is also carried out by consolidating all elements of civil society in the region. Civil society networks become a force to influence regional budgets. Relevant experiences regarding this were written by FITRA Riau in the article Budget Reallocation Towards Effectiveness and Efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Encouraging pressure groups to fight for budget allocations that favor the people is very effective and moving. One of them is the experience of Lakpesdam NU which was recorded in When the People and Ulama Advocate for the Budget. Through Batsul Masail as a decision-making method for the ulama, budget problems were discussed and resolved. This experience in Cilacap Regency can be an effective model for other regions to strengthen advocacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In addition to encouraging religious groups to be involved in the budgeting process, several institutions that care about gender-responsive budgeting encourage women to participate in the budgeting process. They not only pursue a minimum quota of 30% for women in political participation but also create their own procedures to unite women in one voice through women's Musrenbang. IDEA's experience in the Meaninglessness of Participation Without Allocation is expected to be a model of participation with clear allocation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These various notes on the budget advocacy process are presented in the book entitled Where is Our Money? Budget Advocacy in Indonesia. The book, which is printed in two languages, is expected to provide a direct picture of the notes of budget advocates. We hope that the stories of success, failure, and changes contained in this manuscript can inspire readers in understanding budget advocacy in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The process of summarizing this story is one of the follow-ups to the meeting of five budget advocacy institutions (IDEA - Initiative - Lakpesdam NU - PATTIRO - Seknas FITRA). These five institutions are in the process with the support of the Partnership Initiative of the International Budget Partnership to provide an overview of the most significant changes in budget advocacy carried out in Indonesia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It must be admitted that budget advocates who are enthusiastic in the process of advocacy are often in tatters in writing their experiences. However, the hard work of the authors to present and summarize their notes and memories deserves appreciation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our gratitude goes to the core team of the collaboration of 5 institutions, the authors, editors, and translators who have been in the process of presenting this book. Our special gratitude<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Foreword<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Budget Advocacy in Indonesia | vii<\/p>\n\n\n\n

convey to Debbie Budlender - part of the Partnership Initiative support - who was very patient in providing advice and guiding with sharp questions during the preparation of this book. In addition, the International Budget Partnership team that has supported the writing process deserves our deepest gratitude.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We hope that this book can be a valuable contribution to budget advocacy in Indonesia and be an inspiration for other countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yogyakarta, May 20, 2011<\/p>\n\n\n\n

IDEA \u2013 Initiative \u2013 Lakpesdam \u2013 Pattiro \u2013 FITRA National Secretariat<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Kata PengantarPerjalanan advokasi anggaran di Indonesia berawal dari maraknya gerakan anti korupsi, tepatnya sejak dimulainya era otonomi daerah pada tahun 2000. Korupsi yang awalnya sentralistik pun ikut bergeser ke provinsi dan kabupaten\/kota. Lembaga eksekutif dan parlemen daerah menjadi sarang korupsi. Perlawanan terhadap korupsi inilah yang menjadi agenda awal para pegiat advokasi anggaran, seiring dengan pemberlakuan desentralisasi fiskal. Selanjutnya advokasi anggaran bergeser untuk menakar alokasi anggaran dalam pemenuhan hak dasar sekaligus mendorong proses penganggaran yang partisipatif, transparan, dan akuntabel.Buku yang sedang Anda baca ini berusaha mendokumentasikan pengalaman para pegiat advokasi anggaran ketika berurusan dengan berbagai kasus korupsi dan pengelolaan anggaran daerah yang buruk. Cakupan pengalaman yang direkam dalam naskah ini cukup luas. Laporan Seknas Fitra, Tiada Kata Cukup? misalnya, menunjukkan advokasi anggaran tidak lepas dari aspek peraturan dan perundang-undangan. Pada bagian yang lain, PATTIRO Malang membagi pengalaman mereka mendorong pembentukan dan implementasi anggaran daerah yang berorientasi pemenuhan hak dasar warga negara, khususnya pendidikan. Pengalaman advokasi mereka dapat disimak pada artikel Meraih Hak atas Pendidikan Melalui BOSDA. Pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan juga menjadi sasaran gerakan advokasi anggaran. Kemendesakan isu ini menyedot banyak sumber daya organisasi-organisasi masyarakat sipil, salah satunya adalah Perkumpulan Inisiatif, Bandung. Upaya mereka menyusun landasan kebijakan anggaran yang menjamin akses kepada layanan kesehatan yang murah tertuang dalam Sehat Itu Murah dan Mudah. Peraturan Daerah tentang jaminan kesehatan itu diharapkan menjadi starting point agar layanan kesehatan bagi warga miskin murah dan mudah dijangkau. Dari sekian banyak permasalahan kesehatan di Indonesia, kesehatan reproduksi perempuan dan anak menjadi bagian yang cukup menonjol. Angka kematian ibu melahirkan yang tinggi, berbagai kasus anak kurang gizi (bayi lahir dengan berat badan rendah) melatarbelakangi gerakan advokasi anggaran kesehatan yang dilakukan oleh kelompok perempuan. Keterlibatan perempuan dalam pos pelayanan terpadu atau lebih dikenal dengan Posyandu menjadi inspirasi bagi PATTIRO Surakarta untuk menjawab tantangan advokasi di sektor itu. Laporan mereka ada dalam artikel Mengawinkan Peran Warga dan Kontribusi APBD Di Posyandu. Mendorong peran kelompok marginal dalam melakukan advokasi anggaran dalam pemenuhan hak dasarnya juga dilakukan oleh kelompok difabel (different ability). Upaya SAPDA dalam Mendorong Kebangkitan Difabel untuk Memperjuangkan Hak mulai terwujud dari proses advokasinya yang dilakukan di Yogyakarta. Hal serupa dilakukan oleh kelompok petani yang diorganisasi oleh KSPPM di Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara. Di Indonesia yang adalah negara agraris dengan penduduk yang rata-rata bertani, sudah selayaknya petani lebih sejahtera dan mendapat alokasi anggaran yang memadai untuk meningkatkan hasil pertanian. Tulisan yang bertajuk Memahami Anggaran Memanen Kesejahteraan menceritakan upaya petani dalam advokasi anggaran pertanian. Pemenuhan hak ekonomi sosial budaya sebagai hak dasar warga negara melalui anggaran tersebut dilengkapi oleh advokasi proses penganggaran untuk pemenuhan hak sipil dan politik. Dalam siklus penganggaran yang diawali dengan perencanaan, posisi tawar masyarakat sipil serta kelompok marjinal akan sangat mempengaruhi arah kebijakan anggaran. Dengan kata kunci partisipasi, transparansi, dan akuntabilitas, perbaikan proses penganggaran dilakukan oleh elemen masyarakat sipil. Upaya mendorong Pelembagaan Partisipasi dan Transparansi Anggaran Daerah dilakukan oleh P3ML di Kabupaten Sumedang. Melalui Perda Prosedur Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Daerah, gagasan tentang pagu indikatif kewilayahan dan Forum Delegasi Musrenbang ditetapkan dalam Perda. Perda ini menjadi rujukan bagi advokasi di banyak daerah di Indonesia. Selain pelembagaan proses penganggaran dalam sebuah peraturan perundangan, penguatan proses penganggaran dilakukan pula dengan mengkonsolidasikan seluruh elemen masyarakat sipil di daerah. Jejaring masyarakat sipil menjadi kekuatan untuk mempengaruhi anggaran daerah. Pengalaman yang relevan mengenai hal itu ditulis oleh FITRA Riau dalam artikel Realokasi Anggaran Menuju Efektivitas dan Efisiensi. Mendorong kelompok penekan (pressure group) dalam memperjuangkan alokasi anggaran yang berpihak pada rakyat, sangat efektif dan menggerakkan. Salah satunya adalah pengalaman Lakpesdam NU yang dicatat dalam Ketika Rakyat bersama Ulama Mengadvokasi Anggaran. Melalui Batsul Masail sebagai metode pengambilan keputusan para ulama, permasalahan anggaran dibahas dan diselesaikan. Pengalaman di Kabupaten Cilacap ini bisa menjadi model yang efektif bagi daerah lain untuk memperkuat advokasi. Selain mendorong kelompok keagamaan untuk terlibat dalam proses penganggaran, beberapa lembaga yang peduli pada anggaran responsif gender mendorong perempuan untuk berpartisipasi dalam proses penganggaran. Mereka tidak hanya mengejar kuota minimum perempuan 30 % dalam partisipasi politik tetapi membuat prosedur sendiri untuk menggabungkan perempuan dalam satu suara melalui Musrenbang perempuan. Pengalaman IDEA dalam Tiada Maknanya Partisipasi Tanpa Alokasi diharapkan menjadi model partisipasi dengan alokasi yang jelas. Beragam catatan proses advokasi anggaran inilah yang dipaparkan dalam buku yang berjudul Di Mana Uang Kami? Advokasi Anggaran di Indonesia. Buku yang dicetak dalam dua bahasa ini diharapkan bisa memberikan gambaran catatan pelaku advokasi anggaran secara langsung. Kami berharap cerita-cerita keberhasilan, kegagalan, dan perubahan-perubahan yang ada dalam naskah ini dapat menjadi inspirasi bagi pembaca dalam memahami advokasi anggaran di Indonesia. Proses merangkum kisah ini merupakan salah satu tindak lanjut pertemuan lima lembaga advokasi anggaran (IDEA \u00e2\u20ac\u201cInisiatif \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Lakpesdam NU \u00e2\u20ac\u201c PATTIRO \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Seknas FITRA). Kelima lembaga ini berproses atas dukungan Partnership Initative of the International Budget Partnership untuk memberikan gambaran perubahan paling signifikan dalam advokasi anggaran yang dilakukan di Indonesia. Harus diakui bahwa pegiat advokasi anggaran yang bersemangat dalam proses melakukan advokasi seringkali compang-camping dalam melakukan penulisan pengalamannya. Namun upaya keras para penulis untuk menghadirkan dan merangkum kembali catatan dan ingatannya patut mendapat apresiasi. Ucapan terima kasih kami sampaikan kepada tim inti kolaborasi 5 lembaga, para penulis, penyunting, dan penerjemah yang telah berproses menghadirkan buku ini. Ucapan terima kasih secara istimewa kami Kata Pengantar Advokasi Anggran di Indonesia | vii sampaikan kepada Debbie Budlender \u00e2\u20ac\u201cmerupakan bagian dukungan Partnership Initiative \u2013yang sangat telaten memberikan saran dan memandu dengan pertanyaan-pertanyaan tajam selama penyusunan buku ini. Selain itu, tim International Budget Partnership yang telah mendukung proses penulisan ini berhak atas ucapan terima kasih yang dalam dari kami. Kami berharap buku ini dapat menjadi sumbangsih yang bernilai bagi advokasi anggaran di Indonesia dan menjadi inspirasi bagi negara lain. Yogyakarta, 20 Mei 2011 IDEA \u2013 Inisiatif \u2013 Lakpesdam \u2013 Pattiro \u2013 Seknas FITRA Kata PengantarPerjalanan advokasi anggaran di Indonesia berawal dari maraknya gerakan anti korupsi, tepatnya sejak dimulainya era otonomi daerah pada tahun 2000. Korupsi yang awalnya sentralistik pun ikut bergeser ke provinsi dan kabupaten\/kota. Lembaga eksekutif dan parlemen daerah menjadi sarang korupsi. Perlawanan terhadap korupsi inilah yang menjadi agenda awal para pegiat advokasi anggaran, seiring dengan pemberlakuan desentralisasi fiskal. Selanjutnya advokasi anggaran<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1820,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_theme","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[148],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-buku"],"amp_enabled":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1819"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1821,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1819\/revisions\/1821"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}