{"id":2018,"date":"2012-07-30T08:01:00","date_gmt":"2012-07-30T08:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/?p=2018"},"modified":"2024-10-13T16:21:16","modified_gmt":"2024-10-13T16:21:16","slug":"bedah-lkpj-gunungkidul-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/2012\/07\/30\/bedah-lkpj-gunungkidul-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Gunungkidul 2011 LKPJ Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the 2011 Gunungkidul LKPJ, the budget allocation for out-of-region working visits (kunker) was absorbed by 84% or Rp. 4.5 billion compared to the planning of Rp. 4.7 billion. Out-of-region working visit agendas in many regions have become a \"pleasure\" event for regional elites. There has never been an effort to be accountable to the public for the work visit agenda that has been carried out. What are the benefits obtained from the work visit and to what extent does it have an impact on improving the performance of the DPRD and the functions carried out by the DPRD. For example, the DPRD is able to carry out the function of budget supervision, so that it is truly able to decide on budget policies that favor the poor. The work visit agenda is important to increase the capacity of DPRD members, but it will be useless if the results of the&nbsp;<em>capacity building<\/em>&nbsp;are not used to determine policies that favor the community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This became one of the discussions by Srawung (Sarana Rembug Warga untuk Gunungkidul) during the 2011 GK LKPJ review. When compared to the program for women's empowerment and child protection which was only Rp. 146 million, then the budget allocation for the work visit should have been reduced, and could be used to reallocate the budget for women's empowerment and child protection, where problems related to these issues still occur a lot in Gunungkidul. The program for clean water needs for poor families, from the budget allocation of Rp. 491.8 million, was realized at Rp. 326.27 million. This irony must be changed immediately, by reducing wasteful budgets, and allocating budgets that are truly in accordance with the needs of the community and addressing the problems in Gunungkidul.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DalamLKPJ Gunungkidul Tahun 2011,&nbsp; alokasi anggaran untuk kunjungan kerja(kunker) keluar daerah serapannya mencapai 84% atau sebesar Rp.4,5 Milyar dibandingkan dengan perencanaan sebesar Rp.4,7 Milyar. Agenda-agenda kunker keluar daerah dibanyak daerah menjadi ajang \u201cplesiran\u201d bagi elite daerah. Tidak pernah ada upaya pertanggungjawaban kepada public atas agenda kunker yang sudah dilakukan. Apa manfaat yang didapatkan dari kunker dan sejauh mana berdampak terhadap perbaikan kinerja DPRD dan fungsi-fungsi yang dilakukan oleh DPRD. Misalnya DPRD mampu melakukan fungsi pengawasan anggaran, sehingga benar-benar mampu memutuskan kebijakan anggaran yang berpihak kepada masyarakat miskin. Agenda kunker menjadi penting untuk meningkatkan kapasitas anggota DPRD, namun akan menjadi tidak bermanfaat ketika hasil&nbsp;capacity building&nbsp;tersebut tidak digunakan untuk menetapkan kebijakan yang berpihak kepada masyarakat. Hal tersebut menjadi menjadi salah satu pembahasan oleh Srawung (Sarana Rembug Warga untuk Gunungkidul) saat bedah LKPJ GK 2011. Jika dibandingkan dengan program untuk pemberdayaan perempuan dan perlindungan anak yang hanya sebesar Rp.146 juta, maka alokasi anggaran untuk kunker seharusnya bisa dikurangi, dan bisa untuk realokasi anggaran untuk pemberdayaan perempuan dan perlindungan anak, dimana persoalan terkait isu tersebut masih banyak terjadi di Gunungkidul. program kebutuhan air bersih untuk keluarga miskin, dari alokasi anggaran sebesar Rp.491,8 juta, terealisasi sebesar Rp.326,27 juta. Ironi ini harus segera dirubah, dengan mengurangi anggaran yang boros, dan mengalokasikan anggaran yang benar-benar sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat dan mengatasi persoalan yang ada di Gunungkidul.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2019,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_theme","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[164],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jurnal"],"amp_enabled":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2018"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2018\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2020,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2018\/revisions\/2020"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/perkumpulanidea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}